Friday, July 16, 2010

Theory of Employment - Larry Winget meets Selden/Colvin Angel Customers

I have been expanding a theory by the authors Winget, Selden and Colvin related to staffing and managing employees I thought you may be interested in.

In any company you have 20% of the worker who are great, 20% who are bad and 60% in the middle.

The Top 20%

These are workers you don't even have to manage.  Just stay out of their way and try to make them happy.  The top 20% probably do 50% of the work that gets done in a company.  Unless you company is growing at a fast rate you will not be able to keep the top 20% long term as they are on such a fast track to success that they will eventually out grow the company. 

The Middle 60%

These are worker who are average in every way.  These are the workers who need the bulk of a managers time in training, review and mentoring to either motivate them into improve into the top 20% or show that they are actually a bottom 20% performer and should be replaced.  The middle 60% contributes about 60% of the workload.

The Bottom 20%

These are the worker where most managers spend the bulk of their time.  It is a waste for both you and the worker as you need to be focusing on getting the most out of your productive employees and not babysitting these jokers.  The bottom 20% of workers should be put on notice and fired unless they move into one of the higher categories in a short time.  They may be nice people, but they are not doing their fair amount of work.  The bottom 20% probably contributes -10% of the workload as their errors and lack of diligence cause more work for the other two categories.

So that is the basics of the theory.  My contention is that if a company does not fire the bottom 20% of employees and it is true that the top 20% leave then eventually you will end up with 50% or more of the employees in the bottom 20% of performance.  I believe that unproductive workers, much like unproductive customers actually do negative work as they cause problems for the rest of your workers.

1 comment:

  1. Excellent points. Too many problem employees that took way too much of my time for very little reward. I do believe in giving multiple chances becasue there are some that can move from the bottom to at least the middle if given a chance (Some have never had a manager that cared) but in the end if they are disruptive to growth and take too much of your time then you run the risk of being pulled back into the middle of the pack.

    ReplyDelete